| Going through a large sample of Cypraea helvola (which had come from the 'pockets' offshore of Makua) has again brought a surprising discovery. This one is a shell which seems almost certain to have been worn as an adornment by the ancient Hawaiians. Its condition is discussed below, along with examples of naturally damaged shells. |
![]() ![]() A fatal hole in a Honey Cowry (left, enlarged) |
![]() | Fatal hole #2
(left, ~3x life size) (below, a closer view) ![]() |
![]() The pieces of a cowry mentioned in a Hawaiian Shell News article, March of 1991. Note the damage in the center of the dorsum; other parts cracked instead. The damage (below) still occurred even though the top did not yield. Several of its layers flaked away before other sections of the shell cracked. ![]() |
![]() Point of collapse on the dorsum of a Cypraea leviathan. Notice how the inside layers gave way more than those directly under the claw. Part of the claw's contact area is shown by the arc in the middle of the dorsum (below). ![]() |
![]() Below, all I got of a C. carneola shell. Above, the damaged nacre by the break. Crabs often scuttle into a hole after exposing an animal's flesh. Other creatures may try to rob it after it's done the hard part of gaining access to its meal.
|
In all of the above instances, which are very typical of a crab's method, the crushing pressure comes down onto the dorsum and up into the aperture. The damage caused on the dorsum is similar to a bee-bee gun's mark on a plate glass window; the force leaves a smaller hole on the side it impacts and leaves a larger, cone-shaped void on the inside. That is an important characteristic of this type of destruction.
A shell
found in 1988; ~10 metersof water, 100+ meters offshore. Length = 0.757 inch (~19¼ mm) Below, close-up views of its posterior and anterior holes, respectively. ![]() ![]() |
I was struck by the irregular shapes of the holes since I felt that if these had been made by drilling with a sharp stone, or enlarged by reaming out the initial holes, they would have been more circular, and they should have been slightly larger on the outside, tapering to a smaller diameter on the inner surface of the shell. However, as can be seen in the close-up images above, no noticeable effects of a worker's tool(s) can seen. In fact, the posterior hole plainly shows the expected shape of a hole made by strong pressure from the outer surface. (One subtle bit of curious, though unrelated, information which did not photograph well can almost be seen in the photo of that posterior hole. Where the full thickness of the shell's dorsum is viewable, there is a sharp division, at virtually the halfway point, where the inner material is pure white and the outer materialexcept for the few layers of color which create the patternis a shade of purple that very nearly matches the anterior and posterior tips of this species.)
![]() freak C. helvola. |
I was perplexed for a while as to how and when these two holes might have been made,... both at the same time, or first one and then the other later. Since the shell shows evidence thatagain, very tough to image effectivelythe two outermost layers of nacre had been worn away by wave-powered sand abrasion, I suspect this shell was punctured after it had rolled about in swell-driven sand on the floor of this large and ancient sinkhole which has, for the present, become a submerged 'pocket.' As for the timing that goes with them, a guessbased, as it is, on years of underwater experiencewill have to suffice.
One crab with two claws probably made these holes in an attempt to devour some small 'morsel' which had used this shell as protection against just such an eventuality. Yet, there was the troubling puzzle of how it could have clutched this shell and applied enough force at these off-center points to penetrate it. My surmise is that there was a third pressure point involved,... the rock (or coral) substrate to which the crab would have been clinging. With six strong legs to lock itself down, it could have used that surface as a 'backstop' of sorts as it maneuvered the shell in its claws.
Why wasn't this shell crushed to pieces like the C. caputserpentis shown above? There might have been any one of several events which could have arrived at this outcome: 1.) As the shell began to give way, its occupant may have panicked and tried to flee, only to be consumed by the crab, or 2.) The tiny critter did get away and the crab dropped the shell to pursue it or find a new potential meal, or 3.) In repositioning the shell to complete its destruction, it lost its hold and the shell fell too far away for the crab to deem it worth retaking.
There could easily be some other, more complex series of events which culminated in a small cowry shell with holes suitable for a string to pass through, but I've many more of this species to curate before continuing with a prior research project.
fin.